At 11:03 PM 1/17/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>Joel said:
> > These are not my concerns, but they are expressed commonly as
> > concerns. Canon seems to have made noise suppression its king maker,
> > and let them have it. I don't need ASA 1600.
>--------------------------------------------------
>But you have to learn to think of high ISO in digital terms where the
>ISO setting is another (per frame) exposure control in the same sense as
>shutter speed and aperture. As Moose pointed out recently, noise free,
>high ISO performance can be an equivalence factor for image stabilization.
>
>Image stabilization systems typically allow hand holding the camera at
>about 2 stops beyond not having an IS system. If camera B can produce
>an image at ISO 3200 that is no noisier than camera A at 800 then that
>reduced noise is a significant performance item.
>
>Chuck Norcutt
Good to know, Chuck. Thanks.
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|