| Subject: | [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300 |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:51:35 +1100 |
But should we tell Tiers Hemi? AndrewF On 17/01/2005, at 6:17 AM, Chris Barker wrote: > In addition, I am not sure that I ever knew what the French for "third" > was, but now I do ... ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: 35mm f2 or 35mm f2.8 ?, NSURIT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Evolt review, C.H.Ling |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300, Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Reflexe Numerique - French review of 4/3 and Evolt/E300, Chris Barker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |