Well, I feel my attitude changing as I type! Now, if they'll just fix that
software omission I read about somewhere, I might actually... No, maybe not.
But, then, again...
This would be my first foray into "serious" digital (C-2000Z not qualifying)
and amounting to kind of a tentative toe in the tide. And if I should do so,
it would be with the expectation of probably upgrading later on to a "more
better" camera, so I don't want to start off with an inferior lens that I would
soon replace and most likely never use again.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> According to the editor of Olympus User magazine, Ian Aston, the E-300
> body will be available alone in February. It will be easy then to buy
> it and match it with the Zuiko Digital or, perhaps, a Sigma digital.
>
> Chris
>
> On 16 Jan 2005, at 18:41, Walt Wayman wrote:
>
> > That's exactly my main gripe and the reason I've come to a
> > resoundingly conclusive tentative probably maybe "No" about buying
> > one. If you replace the cheapie lens with the better one, what the
> > heck do you do with the cheapie? Sell it for $5 on *Bay as a
> > paperweight?
> >
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|