On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:59:36 -0800, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I personally wouldn't go as far back as the D30. So many things beyond
> megapixels have improved since then. I first tried the idea out with a
> borrowed D60. I was pretty pleased overall with the results
> <http://www.geocities.com/dreammoose/D60/index.htm>, but the camera is
> pretty big and heavy. I ended up with a 300D and find it an excellent
> camera that works well with OM mount lenses and the adapter. On the
> other hand, the E300 is now out and getting cheaper and comes with a
> free OM adapter, which is about a $200 (with tax and shipping) advantage
> over buying an adapter for Can*n. Certainly it is a better camera than
> the old D30.
Neither Oly has histogram display, rather critical given the 5ish stop
range it can capture at best :( wonder if a firmware update will fix it in
the E1/300
--
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
email/msn:msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|