Hi Fernando,
I occasionally lose a shot because of intrusive electricity/telephone
cables. Maybe walking cross country helps keep them to a minimum and also
offers the choice of changing angles/viewpoints not being restricted to a
road. Generally speaking if there are cables in a shot I let it go.
Sometimes I am so keen on a shot that if I can frame a shot with minimum
cable content I still take it and take pot luck on whether I can Photoshop
them out.
Photoshop is obviously great for that but I try to avoid it possible because
once I take something out I can never look at the shot again without
'seeing' what I took out, even if there is no trace. Drives me nuts.
Thanks for looking and to all who have commented.
--Graham
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fernando Gonzalez Gentile" <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 29 December 2004 04:50
Subject: [OM] Re: may be of interest to meterologists
> I haven't commented on Graham's photos because I cannot find the proper
> words. This is to be understood as a compliment, in case of doubt.
>
> But there's one thing I'd like to know, Graham: how is it that you find
> landscapes where those poles on which electricity or telephone lines hang.
> They happen to ruin any attempt of mine to plagiarize your work :^)
> Or is it that at Northamptonshire all wires go underground ?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Fernando.
>
> > From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I haven't commented on any of Graham's photos for quite awhile.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|