> Andrew McPhee [mailto:macca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> I must admit to a mailbox fetish,...
My photo-fetish is for those public viewing telescopes you
get at lookouts and tourist stops.
...that, and feet when I can get away with it (which is
rare, so sometimes I have to self-gratify ;) ).
Anyone else have a particular photo-fetish?
Also, keeping with Edward Weston's statement (as quoted* by
Walt), and with the current Subject, I took second and
multi-second photos of the TV picture on the weekend**, so
I didn't even have to go to the backyard, yet alone "500
yards", and simply lounged on the...well, lounge, camera
in one hand and drink*** in the other. I love Sundays.
OM Content: my favourite photo of a public viewing telescope
was the first, taken with a c5050z at dusk with some fillflash
and an interesting backgroud in almost-silhouette. I'll have
to dig it out again.
Cheers
Marc (either learning about light, or just getting lazier)
Sydney, Oz
* "Anything more than 500 yards from the car just isn't
photogenic."
** The photos looked better the more I lounged and drank
(see notes under "***")
*** Not anything "peaty", but simply something with gin;
Bombay Sapphire to be precise.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|