Now,
this is one of the things I definitely DON'T like about the digital
workflow:
The Magic Multiplication Of Files. I see myself ending up with 1. a lowres
file, 2. an aRGB-file, 3. an sRGBfile, 4. probably a RAW for "you never
know" reasons, 5. the artsy one and I'm sure I missed 6!
That's what I like about my neg's / slides: analogue searching (Verrrry
fast), and one "Mother-file" which can be scanned over and over... if I want
so. (And I keep them clean and dry).
Iwert.
BTW: About 15 pictures I made got publicized in a "biography" about Jo
Coenen, a very good Dutch architect. Long live the 24 shift + velvia!
http://www.naipublishers.nl/architectuur/coenen.html
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dorothée Rapp"
>
> Monitors never support aRGB. aRGB uses a wider colour gamut then sRGB,
> especially for greens. (For those who understand german there is an
> excellent pdf about colour management here:
> http://schraeder.oly-e.de/Color%20Management.pdf).
> For use in the net or normal printing you should have the correct
> defaults in PS (or any other pp software), working aRGB, don't change,
> and convert to sRGB before saving (Image, Mode, convert colour space or
> something like that).
> If you ever intend to have your pics professionally printed, aRGB gives
> you the wider colour space. On the other hand, if you're sure you won't,
> it might be better to use sRGB, because this results in a greater range
> of tonalities in that smaller space.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|