Hi Walt,
Like I said, I value your opinion. The S20 value for money rating just got a
boost.
--Graham
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 13 December 2004 19:50
Subject: [OM] Re: Hollowell Northamptonshire #13
> Whoa! Hold on here! Just a dadgum minnit!
>
> I have a Minolta 5400 for 35mm and an Epson 3200 for 6x9. AND I still
have my little HP S20, AND I still use it. I continue to be amazed at how
good it is after all these (three, at least) years. For anything intended
for viewing on a computer screen at a sensible file size, it's way more than
good enough, and it's fast. I may still have it when the other two scanners
are gone.
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "GeeBee" <geebee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> [snip]
>
> > I knew absolutely nothing about scanning when I bought the S20 as it was
> > before I tapped into the collective knowledge of photo lists. If I were
> > buying one today I would probably spend more for a better one and follow
in
> > the footsteps of someone like Walt who knows what he is doing. However,
the
> > S20 isn't pushing me to upgrade so I will probably stay with it for the
> > foreseeable future.
> >
> > --Graham
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|