Moose wrote:
> The OM-3 just didn't offer much value for price to most
> buyers and was quickly discontinued. The OM-3Ti didn't show up for
> another 9 years after the OM-3 was discontinued and 8 years after the OM-1n.
If the OM-3 was so unpopular with buyers, why did they go on to produce the
even more expensive 3Ti when it offered (to all intents and purposes) the same
apparent *subset* of functionalities of the 4Ti as the 3 did of the 4? After
all, on paper the 4Ti offered more and cost 2/3 as much. Anyone here buy a 3Ti
new? Why did they choose it over the 4Ti?
If they won't appease a few old OM users by producing an OM-6 digital back,
then why did they produce a camera like the 3Ti when sales of the 3 had told
them there was little market for such a camera?
Simon
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|