Nobody had explicitly complained - what I had in mind was a notional
rhetorical complaint (maybe?). But my comment was not directed at you (or
anybody else) as far as I am concerned.
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Simon Worby
Sent: 10 December 2004 18:46
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Defending Jonequinn
Piers Hemy wrote:
> <snip>
> I agree with you Jeff - our only complaint logically is that he
> 'stocks' the most desirable pieces of OM equipment, and his prices
> appear too high for us. Guess what - too bad! <snip> And as Walt
> pointed out, maintaining a high market value for items we have (even
> if we don't each have them all) is doing us no harm at all, quite the
> reverse.
I'm not sure who of us was complaining. Certainly not I. Why the defence
since there was no accusation?
Simon
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|