Sounds good to me but only if it is a genuine Oly cap and not a third
party one. Recovering a small piece of brass shim from a dead OM to
make the pinhole would place it beyond dispute. perhaps a piece of a
top cover or a blade from a 50/1.8 iris?
If there are objections, we would then have to disqualify any pix taken
with a Tamron mounted on an OM-2000 on the grounds that the only Oly
component is the name stamped on the camera and that has a much lesser
effect on the quality of the light entering.
AndrewF
On 08/12/2004, at 7:28 PM, Jez Cunningham wrote:
>
> I wonder, would an OM body cap (with pinhole) fitted to a Kindai
> OM/EOS adaptor, on a C*anon 10D body, be OM-enough for a TOPE or
> Solstice entry? :-)
> br
> jez
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|