In a message dated 11/24/2004 9:25:33 PM Central Standard Time,
farali@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I picked one up (F3.5) in a
bargain bin at a local camera shop in Cleveland....not bad fang for ten
bucks. Someone mentioned that the lens is not good for portraits. I have
heard otherwise. Whats the deal on this lens? Is this actually an
Olympus made lens or 3rd party? Just wondered.
This is not a third party lens. This focal length is at the upper end of
what many think of as being a good one for head and shoulder type work. I
prefer something which requires me to get a little closer like something in
the
85 to 100mm range, however each person has their favorites. So I'd say
whatever works best for you, is the best lens. The f3.5 is much smaller and
much
lighter than its big brother the f2.8. The question which comes up for me is,
"How do you like the results you are able to produce with this lens?" That
is probably the only question that has any relevance. Many people prefer the
lens you own. You got a very good deal on the lens. Doris would be proud
of you! As for the person who said the lens wasn't good for portraits, did
you see any of their work done with another lens that you would be proud to
call your own? I would bet the answer is "no." So, use it, enjoy it, produce
some images that please you and when you decide you need something else (if
that happens) find a new home for it on the list and find what you are looking
for here. Bill Barber
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|