<Andrew wrote>
<snip>
the large one might be an old croft house but it's too small to be sure, so
it's distracting
</snip>
Just had another look at it on the site and I see what you mean. However,
it is quite a bit clearer on the original print and scan. I had to reduce
the quality quite a bit to get it down to a suitable size to put on the
web. Do you (or anyone else) find it better to reduce the quality when
converting from TIFF to JPEG or when you do the 'Save for Web' in PS?
Thanks.
Jason.
This message and any attachments (the "message") is
intended solely for the addressees and is confidential.
If you receive this message in error, please delete it and
immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with
its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole
or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet
can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not
therefore be liable for the message if modified.
**********************************************************************************************
BNP Paribas Private Bank London Branch is authorised
by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services
Authority for the conduct of its investment business in the
United Kingdom.
BNP Paribas Securities Services London Branch is authorised
by CECEI & AMF and is regulated by the Financial Services
Authority for the conduct of its investment business in the
United Kingdom.
BNP Paribas Fund Services UK Limited is authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|