Hi,
Mine is an AT-X, but its images, as I said, is far worse than any other Zuiko I
purchased. I avoid use it, and do not sell it cause it is not ok cosmetically.
Francisco Campos
De:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
Para:olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Cópia:
Data:Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:55:05 -0800
Assunto:[OM] Re: OM4TI
> bsb27242 wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >and a 35-70mm "plastic" Zuiko zoom (great too for a zoom lens).
> >
> The 35-70/3.5-4.5 is indeed. The 3.5-3.8,a relabeled Cosina, has a less
> savory reputation.
>
> >I also bought a zoom Tokina 35-200mm for Olympus mount, which I rarely use
> >(its optics is far worse than that of the Zuiko's).
> >
> I have found the AT-X 35-200/3.5-4.5 to be an excellent lens. The SZ-X
> 35-200 is less impressive so far. With Tokina's penchant for multiple
> models, there are probably other 35-200 Tokinas too.
>
> Moose
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 19/11/2004 / Vers?o: 4.3.20
> (10.21) - Dat 4409
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|