Skip Williams wrote:
> My opinion is that there isn't any market for OM bodies of any sort,
> and there hasn't been for many years. Without AF lenses, an introduction
> of a digital OM body would have been stupidity. We dinosaurs represent a
> tiny, unprofitable minority as a primary user market.
The E-1 will/can never be mass-market, either, even though it has all the
mod-cons. But it means at least that Olypmus does have the technology.
I just don't believe that a digital OM body would be expensive in terms of R&D
or production. And whilst I agree that it's not a camera your average
man-in-the-street would buy, I also don't think that necessarily makes it wrong.
Simon
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|