Iwert
Thanks for your opinion on this. I was disappointed to see fringing
between the sky and the castellations/;buttresses of the church tower.
Is this, do you think, because of the non-digital lenses?
Chris
On 6 Nov 2004, at 13:31, iwert wrote:
> Because the zuiko 21 f2 is useable, but only at aperture from f4,
> under that
> it is soft. The Zuiko 50f2 is very useable, and has a wonderfull
> bokeh. The
> 100f2 is useable as well, certainly from f2.8 on. The 180 f2.8 really
> needs
> a tripod, which I did not have with me.
>
> Fourth impression: The quality of the top notch OM optics on film
> beats the
> E-1 with OM or ZD. It is NOT top notch on an E-1, but useable. I guess
> when
> an E-3 comes, it will be very clear Olympus did not exagerate digital
> (at
> least 4/3) needs specific lenses.
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|