Agreed Winsor. I am intrigued by the idea of the E-300's viewfinder.
The camera will be a winner if the Viewfinder is up to scratch and the
noise under control.
Chris
On 6 Nov 2004, at 3:59, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> Well I think you have the choice of at least a couple of very compact
> DSLRs now. So there is no reason to consider an EVF camera.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> Yes, but AG was writing about DSLRs having an EVF. But more to the
>> point: if a camera has to have an EVF I won't buy or use that sort of
>> camera. It removes me from the photographing process by too much.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|