Subject: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200/2.8 was Wooo Hoooo . . . |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:23:27 -0800 |
When I discovered ow hard to find and expsnsive the bits and pieces for this lens are, I returned the one I had just bought. Later, I found one complete with all the bits. I think it was a few dollars cheaper, too. Moose Andrew Gullen wrote: >That's a point. Looks like the parts *I* may have to supply are: hood, foot, >front cap and rear cap. It does add up > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [photo] Fall Leaves 2, Richard Lovison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: DSLR decision, was Watercolor/fine art paper, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200/2.8 was Wooo Hoooo . . ., Skip Williams |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron 80-200/2.8 was Wooo Hoooo . . ., Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |