Thanks for the critique. There wasn't much if any sharpening in the
workflow. I suspect the effect is possibly from over-compression.
Joel W.
At 02:00 AM 11/2/2004 -0800, you wrote:
>A very pretty image with an almost surreal quality that I like a lot.
>
>Your recent "fragments" have struck me as beautiful shots, but most also
>look oversharpened to me. Now I know I oversharpen some of my images, so
>this may be the pot calling the kettle black. I recently set up a
>gallery of shots from 1970, but when I ran through it a few days later,
>I realized that they were mostly oversharpened and it was detracting
>from their overall quality. I have the same feeling about your recent
>shots. Just one man's opinion, but for me, they would look better with a
>little less busy edginess, or whatever one calls it.
>
>Moose
>
>Joel Wilcox wrote:
>
> >http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/day28.html
> >
>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|