Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Trip to the big city - pro processing lab

Subject: [OM] Re: Trip to the big city - pro processing lab
From: "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:47:02 -0500
I agree that he's generally OK.  I bought an Invercone for my Weston Master IV 
from him, and it was MUCH better than the picture.  I pay attention to his text 
and go by that.  With Rocky, I think the bad pics are an advantage to a 
knowledgeable buyer.

Earl

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/31/2004 at 2:30 PM Andrew Fildes wrote:

>Absolutely. There's an English seller (Rocky) who is notorious for his  
>pix - huge files, uncropped and out of focus. He's generally OK but I  
>just don't bother any more - too much like hard work. I cannot  
>understand why someone with deals in the many thousands hasn't wised  
>up. NOTHING improves bidding as much as 2 or 3 decent pix.
>And missing bits is a worry all right - I live in terror of losing a  
>16mm front cap or 135mm macro rear cap. Some of them I store at home  
>and use cheap substitutes in the field. To lose the caps from an LF  
>lens is very careless indeed.
>AndrewF
>
>
>On 31/10/2004, at 3:23 AM, Walt Wayman wrote:
>
>> Jim,
>>
>> Ordinarily, that's probably exactly what I would do.  But there are a  
>> couple of things about this auction that cause me to hesitate punching  
>> the BIN button and, instead, hoping to snipe it for somewhat less.   
>> (Pay attention here, *Bay sellers.)
>>
>> First, anyone who would (or should) have a lens of this quality and  
>> price ought to be able to take a better picture of it for the auction.
>>
>> Second, he says he has the front and back caps, but not the originals.  
>>  I'm one of the world's worst slobs, totally disorganized, slovenly  
>> even, sometimes fearful of dying under an avalanche of possessions as  
>> I pass along one of the narrow paths through the clutter in this  
>> house.  But there are lenses I've had for 40 years that still have the  
>> original front and back caps.  Not a big deal, I suppose, but it's  
>> still a bit of a red flag for me.
>>
>> These little things cause me to hesitate just enough that I've set a  
>> snipe a reasonable amount lower than the BIN.  If it gets the lens,  
>> okay.  If not, that's okay too.  Like trains and busses, there's  
>> always another one coming along.
>>
>> Walt
>>
>> --
>> "Anything more than 500 yards from
>> the car just isn't photogenic." --
>> Edward Weston
>>
>>
>> -------------- Original message from Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxx>:  
>> --------------
>>
>>
>>> on 10/29/04 11:06 AM, Walt Wayman at hiwayman@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>>> And here's a lens I really, really, really want, need, must have,  
>>>> can't live
>>>> without. So how much should I snipe it for?
>>>>
>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? 
>>>> ViewItem&category=15247&item=3848389291
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and when I get this marvelous macro miracle machine finished,  
>>>> I'll post
>>>> pictures, both of and taken by it. Luv them 6x9 Velvia trannies!  
>>>> Digit that,
>>>> pixel heads!
>>>
>>> When I 'really really really want need must have can't live without'
>>> something, I just buy it...
>>>
>>> the BIN was still there when I checked.
>>>
>>> Will this cover 6x9 or just 4x5?
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Jim Brokaw
>>> OM-'s of all sorts, and no OM-oney...
>>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================




==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz