Subject: | [OM] Re: moonlighting |
---|---|
From: | "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:46:32 -0400 |
On 10/19/2004 at 9:29 AM Winsor Crosby wrote: <snip> > >What I really don't understand is when the artifact is aped as when >35mm camera users take a nature photograph and deliberately choose a >slow shutter speed to imitate the defect of a large format camera with Defect? I don't understand. Earl ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Looking for a TOPE image, Scott Gomez |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Is it a scam? Advice wanted., Jim Brokaw |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: moonlighting, Roger Wesson |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: moonlighting, Walt Wayman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |