Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM4 currently on Aussie *bay - BEWARE

Subject: [OM] Re: OM4 currently on Aussie *bay - BEWARE
From: Gordon Ross <gordross@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:10:38 -0600
Hi Andrew M:

Andrew abcdefghij&l  if they are interested in the camera should ask about 
the plate saying that they belong to a club of OM users and know about the 
problem- if she knows that the problem is known the cat and mouse game is 
over. If she lies about it , then you should make a note in your feedback.

Gord

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew McPhee" <macca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: OM4 currently on Aussie *bay - BEWARE


> Firstly, let me say I'm wondering how many Andrew's we have on this list -
> I'm one of them and I'M getting confused about who has replied to whom,
> what hope other list members? <grin>
>
> Now to respond to Andrew G about his feedback remark...
>
> I explained in my original post that I'd left her positive feedback, I did
> this for two reasons.
>
> One is that I felt that she'd done the right thing by me and refunded my
> money after I discovered a fault with the camera.  Two is that I gave her
> the benefit of the doubt, thinking that she'd overlooked the fault when
> writing the description.
>
> Maybe I should have left neutral feedback, maybe I'm guilty of being too
> good a sport.  But now it's come back at me and I'm feeling guilt that
> someone else will be stung like I was.
>
> But as Gord pointed out, I can still adjust my feedback.  But in doing so
> I'm calling her bluff about whether the camera has since been repaired, 
> I'm
> not sure how far to go with this.
>
> Andrew McPhee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>At 06:53 AM 19/10/2004 -0400, Andrew Gullen wrote:
>>
>>But she has 100% positive feedback!
>>
>>;-)
>>Andrew
>>
>>>on 2004/10/19 2:51 AM, Andrew McPhee at macca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>>> > The seller has relisted this and is not being totally honest, the
>>> > description is virtually unchanged since when I bought it - all 
>>> > functions
>>> > of the camera are NOT working (at least not as they should).
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz