The photodo numbers are meaningless, at least to me. A few years ago
they were better because they included the graphs the numbers were
based on.
Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA
On Oct 18, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff:
>
> Photo Do doesn't seem much of a fan of Oly glass. For instance the
> Nikkor
> 28/2.8 rates 30% higher than the Zuiko 28/2.0 - really? The Nikkor
> 20/2.8 is
> 15% higher than the 20/2.0 Zuiko ? I would like to hear some of our
> experts
> respond to the photodo ratings. Generally, Canon, Pentax and Nikkor
> all have
> superior ratings to Zuiko according to photodo.
>
> Gord
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Keller" <jrk_om@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:22 AM
> Subject: [OM] Re: Questions, Re: When is enough enough? ...
>
>
>>
>> http://www.photodo.com/nav/prodindex.html is a good place to start.
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Der Eiserne Reiter" <ferider@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [OM] Questions, Re: When is enough enough? ...
>>
>>
>>> Hi AG,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have found charts for various lenses (Russian and Leitz lenses, for
>> instance) including
>>> lines/mm. I was always looking for such charts for Zuiko lenses
>>> (including
>> PEN lenses). Does
>>> anybody on the list know if such information is available ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Roland.
>>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|