Hi Walt:
As Wayne pointed out the 16/3.5 is a glaring hole, but I was surprised to
see two more!
For a guy as 'sharp' as you to not have a 28/2.0 is noteworthy.
Where is the 85/2.0, how could you not have that? (don't throw that 90mm
Tamron at me either :-)
It pains me to point out these things in an otherwise exemplary collection.
But there it is.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
I'd be interested in hearing any opinions about what additional bits and
pieces others think I ought to have. The numbers in brackets, of course,
indicate how many of whatever.
> PRIME LENSES
> 17mm f/3.5 Tamron w/hood
> 21mm f/2.0 Zuiko w/hood, case
> 24mm f/2.5 Tamron w/hood
> 28mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena
> 35mm f/2.0 Zuiko w/hood, case
> 35mm f/2.8 Zuiko shift w/case
> 38mm f/2.8 Zuiko macro
> 50mm f/1.4 Zuiko
> 50mm f/1.8 Zuiko (silver nose)
> 50mm f/1.8 "MIJ" Zuiko
> 50mm f/2.0 Zuiko macro
> 50mm f/3.5 Zuiko macro
> 80mm f/4.0 Zuiko macro
> 90mm f/2.0 Zuiko macro
> 90mm f/2.8 Tamron macro w/hood, case
> 100mm f/2.0 Zuiko w/case
> 135mm f/2.8 Zuiko w/case
> 135mm f/4.5 Zuiko macro w/hood, case
> 180mm f/2.8 Zuiko w/case
> 300mm f/2.8 Tamron w/hood, case, 1.4X, 2X, rear filters
> 300mm f/4.5 Zuiko w/case
> 400mm f/6.3 Zuiko w/case
> 500mm f/8.0 Zuiko
> 1250mm f/10 Celestron w/hood, case
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|