My apologies to CH Ling and others; after a very quick and in no way
scientific test the c*n*n 1D Mark II does underexpose with the 100/2.8 at
smaller apertures.
My excuses for not having worked this out before is that I only shoot RAW
and here in England we never get enough light to go beyond f8 anyway.
I tested against the c*n*n 100/2.8 macro and although the c*n*n is sharper
the Zuiko gives very pleasing results indeed (especially around f5.6 and f8)
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gordon Ross
Sent: 29 September 2004 09:59
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: [photo] Honkers
Hi John:
Since I'm up late anyway, I can help you look for your other paddle :-)
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Wheeler" <wheelej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [OM] Re: [photo] Honkers
Richard, What a great picture! And here's me thinking it was going to be
just another pic of Hong Kong Harbour (mind you, Hong Kong harbour is really
very charming).
>
> John,
> Sydney, Oz.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Behalf Of Richard Lovison
>> Subject: [OM] [photo] Honkers
> http://people.simons-rock.edu/rlovison/temp/Geese.html
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|