The two are almost eactly the same size. The difference is that the lugs of the
bayonet are different sizes.
Dan S.
-------Original Message-------
> From: Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: E-300 and OM-adapter?
> Sent: Sep 28 2004 16:25:23
>
> You mean it's not? I don't actually know, as I haven't been allowed to
play in this sandbox myself. I just assumed (yeah, I know, that makes an ass
out of u and me) that since the original post, by I still don't remember who,
but someone I think I considered knowledgeable, referred to a "smaller mount"
on the E-300, that the E-1 had to have the same "smaller mount," since the
lenses that fit the former also fit the latter. Having never seen an E-1 in
person (or should I say "in camera," except that means, in legal parlance,
something entirely different), I have no idea about the comparative size of
it's hole and the one in an OM. Therefore, realizing I don't know much about
it at all, I'm going to keep my hole shut.
>
> Walt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|