Subject: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens quality ? |
---|---|
From: | "John Cwiklinski" <plinkochips@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:10:32 -0500 |
Christian wrote: >> ... So Tamron could be an alternative. << My thoughts exactly. I bought a C*n*n 1d and cannot afford any decent AF lenses for it! I recently bought Tamron MF lenses, specifically the 90mm f2.8 and 180mm f2.5. I had a problem with an adaptall 2 OM mount but this is now resolved and I can interchange these 2 lenses between OM and Canon bodies with ease. They work quite well. John Cwiklinski -- _______________________________________________ Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10 ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: about a lens, Paul D. Farrar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Mckeown's Price Guide To Antique & Classic Cameras 2005-2006, David Carter |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens quality ?, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tamron lens quality ?, Luca A. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |