I am most impressed by your crystal ball and that you save my old posts.
Winsor
Long Beach, California
USA
On Sep 21, 2004, at 4:10 PM, Moose wrote:
>>
> Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
>> That may be true, but comparison only. I don't think noise is a
>> serious
>> issue for any DSLR. And I am a skeptical of a Mark II version that
>> will
>> be significantly different any time soon. There is no serious
>> competition now, none on the horizon, and no marketing reason
>> upgrade.
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2004, at 1:42 PM, Moose wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Speaking of noise, think carefully about buying a 2 year old design.
>>> The dpreview test shows noise not much better than a D60, which is
>>> noiser
>>> than a 300D. It looks to me like all of the newer, smaller sensor
>>> bodies have better noise. 'Twere me, I'd wait for the Mk II, or
>>> whatever they
>>> call the upgrade which must be due soon.
>>>
> OK, Winsor, I didn't feel like responding at the time, 7 weeks ago, as
> I
> had nothing to go on but intuition. Your LCD/CRT may be better than
> mine, but my crystal ball rules. :-)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|