On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:11:15 +1000, Daniel Tan <aureliax@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:42:35 -0700, Siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Right, but as far as consistent logic in naming, both parties are
>> guilty.
>> >
>
> hmm?
> If you're referring to Nikon's D100/D70, it follows their consumer
> line. The D70 was priced to compete with the 300d, so it was named
> lower than the d100, even though it's superior in some ways.
>
> Daniel
no, i meant that one party followed the D## and other did ##D for bodies;
both freely use both systems, with no consistent link between body number
and pixel count.
--
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
email/msn:msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|