Sorry, missed that.
Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA
On Sep 18, 2004, at 9:32 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>
> Yes, I know but we are talking about image quality only not overall
> cost/power/display quality, as Jeff K. was talking about his Sony CRT
> which
> is much better than his office laptop display.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Winsor Crosby" <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> They are designed to different ends and not necessarily good or bad.
>> The displays on laptops are designed to use up the least amount of
>> battery power while maintaining a decent appearance. One of the ways
>> they do that is to narrow viewing angle. No power to send light from
>> each pixel over a wide angle. That way they can use a much smaller
>> light source in a narrow bright beam, if you don't move your head or
>> the display. So the LCDs in a notebook are very good for what they are
>> designed to do. They are not designed to be a monitor for editing
>> photographs.
>>
>>
>> Winsor
>> Long Beach, CA
>> USA
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|