Wayne S schrieb:
> At 06:16 PM 9/17/2004, Moose wrote:
>
>>>With the E-1 and OM lenses, exposure varies with aperture,
>>>the more you stop it down the more under-exposed it becomes.
>>
>>Is that true? I can't imagine it is so. It is certainly not the way OM
>>lenses work on Can*n DSLR bodies.
>
>
> I'm to lazy to post the series, but with every OM lens I have
> used on the E-1 it does. I was testing bokeh back when Walt
> started us down that path. So I tested the 50/2, 50/1.2, 90/2
> 100/2 on the E-1 at every F-stop.
>
> It is also possible that the E-1 is interpreting the scene in
> EPS mode to be darker and "interprets" that it should be
> exposed less. I should try center weighted average metering
> to confirm.
I have used several OM lenses on my E-1 and never had any underexposed
pictures. Of course I put it on A or P, certainly not S or M (ok, M
would work if metered after stopping down).
I just run a short test with ESP as well as CWA. No difference here.
Shutter speed goes down correctly with each f-stop in both modes
(predicted as well as actual when taking the picture.
Are you sure you didn't accidentally put it on S?
cheers
:Doro
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|