As I always say, besides resolution you can't beat a good DC. The accurate
color reproduction, ability to change ISO for each frame, instant
result/re-shoot, easy of post processing (especially with PhaseOne C1) pay a
very important part so I use E-1 90% of the time.
On the other hand if you do architectural work that can afford to spend more
time on each image then film is better (at least to me). BTW, 24 shift is
great for its focal length but I like 35 shift much more, the color
reproduction and resolution looks better in my experience. The Imacon? Is it
the 3200dpi one? I think it might be better to consider the 4000ED or
5400dpi one from M*nolta unless you really need to do a lots of scanning.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "iwert" <iwert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> What surprised me most is the purple fringing in the E-1 image, which is
unexisting in the OM image. I have been heavily thinking of an E-1 + 11-22
and 50macro for the last weeks, but your examples are showing me more the
direction of my OM's + 21f2, 50f2 and 100f2. (and not to forget, 24shift). I
am still doing much architectural work, and it seems the 21f2 and 24shift +
velvia are not easily replaceable.
> I didn't know about the difficulties DC's have to reperesent light
fixtures... Thank you for showing me!
> Where are the real fast film scanners hiding? someone a used Imacon
flextight for sale?
>
> Iwert.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|