Hi Graham
Now that is funny - quality criticism. He does echo my own concern that
you were unable to get the geese equidistantly spaced - just not good
enough. :)
In the Brandt pic the seagull was quite a large and distinct part of
the composition - and clearly painted in at even a cursory inspection
closer than 'viewing distance.' Superimposition and sandwiching negs.
was once regarded as the height of darkroom technique. Now that we can
all do it well with a little expenditure and effort, it's regarded as
unethical. Sawdust! (insert derogatory expletive of choice).
Regards to the other members G.
AndrewF
On 12/09/2004, at 8:39 PM, GeeBee wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> I agree but the question of degree is valid. I recently posted the shot
> below on
> another list and triggered some good natured banter about the geese
> at the
> bottom of the frame being Photoshopped in. A friend responded by
> claiming I
> had in fact Photoshopped a lot of stuff out and he then posted what he
> claimed was the original :
> http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/Leica/Hollowell_07.htm
> http://www.sonc.com/geebeephoto.htm
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|