Caution, yet another style follows, multi post reply with individual
bottom posting.
Tom Scales wrote:
>Bottom posting made sense in the days of 300 baud modems. It doesn't today.
>
I agree.
James Royall wrote:
>Top-posting is great as far as I'm concerned (using a Mac, but makes no
>difference) - I use a preview pane and so can quickly run through
>messages without having to open or scroll.
>
Yup!
>Bottom posting always makes me mutter.
>
Mostly does for me too. However, I sometimes bottom-post when both quote
and reply are very brief. Sometimes it just looks better and more
readable to me that way.
>Judicious clipping is certainly a help though.
>
Yes indeedy.
Chris Barker wrote:
>You seem to be a good sport Michael, so this is for you – in the
>spirit of convention ... ;-)
>
>I'll give it a go for a few weeks.
>
Oh, no! Your post took much longer to grock than your usual top-post style.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|