Thanks James, I agree. That was why I stopped and took the photos;
there are loads of sunflower photos around, but these seemed special.
In fact, I still have the lovely print that Ralf Loi sent me of
sunflowers; that is pretty vivid as well.
I have left my own image files as they were ;-)
Chris
On 31 Aug 2004, at 14:50, James Royall wrote:
>
> I much prefer the uncorrected versions - I was wondering how you got
> the look until you mentioned evening light. It doesn't seem to affect
> the yellow of the petals. The 'corrected' version has a very
> unsunflower-like muted yellow.
>
> James
>
>
> On 30 Aug 2004, at 13:41, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Fernando
>>
>> Yes, it is a one-touch zoom; I believe that it is easier to carry than
>> the 85-250, which I think is a little bigger – and has the tripod
>> collar.
>>
>> There is a blue cast to the leaves, but I like to think that it is
>> from
>> the cool evening light. However, I have done a little work with the
>> neutral wand in iCorrect and the result is now at:
>>
>> http://www.threeshoes.co.uk/temp/sunflowers/index.htm
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Chris
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|