I am with you on that Donald - it's a very slight difference. A paper which
makes clear (rather, makes 'stark') the differences can be found at
http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Donald MacDonald
Sent: 26 August 2004 17:24
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:12:34 +0000, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If anybody can see any difference, I hope they'll 'splain it to me. I
> guess I'm just not all that sensitive, because bokeh has never been
> that important to me. Unless it's really bad and/or the subject is
> really boring, I usually don't even notice it.
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-724
> 214.html
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-724
> 215.html
>
> Walt, the bokeh clod
>
>
Well IMHO, the second one takes it by a nose, but don't ask me why. It may
be nothing to do with bokeh, contrast or colour, which look pretty much the
same to me.
D.
--
Donald Neil MacDonald BA DipLIS
www.skelpitheid.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|