I agree with Ken (AG) about RF (I think I do, at least ;-)), but I
cannot remember what conclusion I came to James. I am with Alamy as
well, so look for "Barker" and you will see what I labelled mine. I am
about to process another submission so I shall have to work it out
myself again.
I am very sad about Ilford; I am trying to work out what I will do next
about mono.
Chris
On 24 Aug 2004, at 23:12, James Royall wrote:
>
> If I had to lose colour or black and white, I think I'd prefer to lose
> colour - there's something added to a photo by b&w. Now that I have two
> bodies, one for each, I find I go for the one loaded with b&w more
> often than not (and it's not because of the body, colour's in the OM4
> for the spot metering).
>
> As for the stock photography, can anyone give any pointers to the pros
> and cons of licensed versus royalty free when choosing what to set as a
> license type. I understand the difference in what the legal framework
> is, but not how the choice might affect buying decisions. Basically
> I've got a few images to post at alamy.com (a very easy stock agency to
> submit to digitally) and don't know which license type to choose.
>
> James
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|