Subject: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged |
---|---|
From: | "Simon Worby" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 15 Aug 2004 12:05:28 +0100 |
C.H.Ling wrote: > Try it, I have projected my test slide with a Leica Colorplan projection > lens, with careful focus on the exact point I want to view it was not better > than a 4000dpi scan. You may need a MUCH better projection lens to get a > little better resolution, but... there is never one that better than a > microscope, again check my posted microscope view of the slide to make a > comparison. Yes, I see what you mean. Simon ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Digital vs. Film discussions REQUEST TO DSLR USERS, Wayne Culberson |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, Andrew Gullen |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Film vs. Digital @ equivalent 9 x 6 print then cropped and enlarged, jez |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |