C.H.Ling wrote:
> I have done lots of comparison, if just talking about resolution, film is
> still clearly better. But for "noise" and "color", digital is a winner.
> Below is a resolution test I have posted before:
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/Film-10D.htm
Thanks for this. But I still don't think that scanning negatives is a fair way
of doing a comparison at all. If films comes out better for resolution through
scanning negatives, then it has to be streaks ahead for the printed product...
Regards,
Simon
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|