I meant the same Winsor – a single slide. The new shadow/highlight
tool eh? I have not spotted that yet ...
Chris
On 12 Aug 2004, at 22:02, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> I am sure that Moose will answer for himself, but the point I took was
> that his Photoshop actions on a single exposure. You might be able do
> the same thing from a single slide, but I doubt it would be as
> flexible. Two bracketed exposures of the same subject would improve
> things for both types of media.
>
> I am amazed at the versatility in CS of the new shadow/highlight tool
> to do something similar with a lot less work.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California
> USA
> On Aug 12, 2004, at 1:53 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>
>>
>> Hmm, not bad Moose ;-) You've now got me doing this with a shot of my
>> own: 2 digital shots, one exposed for the sky and the subject
>> underexposed, the other the reverse. I am experimenting with layer
>> blending options ... it's no good: I shall have to read the manual for
>> CS!
>>
>> I disagree about its being better than slide. You could treat scanned
>> slide film the same way could you not?
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|