I just got back a roll of NPZ 800 ISO film yesterday that I accidentally
shot at 100 ISO (3 stops underexposed) from a professional lab. The negs
actually look get! Better that 800 ISO negs.
-----Original Message-----
From: Piers Hemy [mailto:piers@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 6:34 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Push C-41?
Many thanks John, just what I needed.
Best
Piers - not curently posting 'cos a burglar has my PC. And my wife's car.
Didn't bother with the OM3, MD1 and Zuiko 100/2.8 lying besdie the PC. He
must be a Canon user?
_____________Original message ____________
Subject: [OM] Re: Push C-41?
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 23:26:38 +0100
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:00:57 +0100, "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>I have some Fuji Press 200 which has been underexposed by 2 stops. Any
>thoughts on whether the film's latitude will be enough to cope with that?
>Is it possible to push-process C-41 without adverse effect on the colour
>balance/contrast (and if so, any thoughts of where to find dev times)?
Piers,
I have done this, but not with this particular emulsion. The "rule of
thumb" is to extend development (at 38C) by 30 seconds for each stop,
so for 2 stops push, develop for 4m 15s at 38C.
I got a noticeable increase in grain, but otherwise usable.
Regards
John Gruffydd (Mold, Wales, UK)
========================= ====================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
========================= ====================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|