#3 is using the settings in the camera and the WB it chose and would use
for JPEGS, not some generic, non-image specific default.
Moose
Joel Wilcox wrote:
>At 10:17 AM 8/6/2004 -0500, I previously wrote:
>
>
>>3) conversion plus auto (does it all for you)
>>
>>#3 makes the image look just like you used auto WB in the camera: might be
>>OK but might not -- a crap shoot
>>
>>
>After deciding that #2 was the way to go, I tried #3 on every subsequent
>scan -- sorry, I mean "conversion image" -- and #3 has since the first few
>images always been better! So I reckon my method will be just to let the
>converter have its way and try to improve on it only if I don't like the
>results. But so far, this just got a lot easier. Nice little plug-in.
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|