Again I am in your debt, Winsor. Thanks much. I'll stay on watch for
dedicated software from Olympus for the c-5060, but I'm guessing the
plug-in for the E-10 is probably OK. It seems to be working fine, but
I'll need to process a few more images of various kinds.
Joel W.
> After I got my D100 I kept reading the forum at dpreview.com
> and there
> was a lot of talk about the differences between raw conversion. I had
> PS CS and had been using it, but decided to try Nikon's
> Capture. Not a
> subtle difference. More shadow detail and vastly better skin tones. I
> have read discussions in other places too. Some manufacturers are
> generous with their code and others are not. Even if they are, the
> difference is this. Each DSLR gets tested for image quality after it
> is manufactured and a series of codes is put in the firmware. The
> manufacturers own software picks up those codes during raw conversion
> so that the converted image reflects the manufacturer's idea of the
> best image the camera can create. That is why it is best to use the
> manufacturer's own conversion and an up to date version that includes
> your own model of camera. It has complicated my workflow, but the
> results are worth it.
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, CA
> USA
> On Aug 4, 2004, at 6:09 PM, Wilcox, Joel F wrote:
>
> > Yes, I always feel OK about moving to a new version of PS,
> but I've got
> > all my color management stuff set up right and tight. It's
> just not a
> > good moment for a major disruption like that.
> >
> > I found a plug-in on Olympus America's site, of all places, for the
> > E-10. It works.
> >
> > The amount of post processing however is a bit more than I bargained
> > for. But the resultant images are luscious.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|