Moose, it's a wonderful photo; I meant nothing about magicry (the
thought did not occur to me). By the way,
http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Glads/pages/15-1083.htm has come out
distorted. Are they really Gladioli as well?
Chris
On 30 Jul 2004, at 22:51, Moose wrote:
> Now, now, no PS magic, no digital fakery in the presence of the
> insects.
> I'm not good enough to fake the shadows under them without making them
> look like cutouts, at least not yet. ;-)
>
> If you look here, you will also see the yellowish one peeking over the
> top of the upper left petal
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Glads/pages/11-1059.htm>. The ladybug
> flew away (without any nursery rhyme encouragement) and the other
> crawled around back. I thought I might catch it silhouetted up on the
> edge of the petal, but wasn't quick enough.
>
> I did only say no PS magic in their presence. I did indeed select them
> and adjust their brightness relative to their surroundings and shadows.
> Here are my first shot, "Omigod, that's way underexposed.", second,
> "Don't overexpose those white petals and lose the detail in them. Oops,
> still a little under, but I caught the bugs, Wow!" and the adjusted
> shot
> from PS <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Combo.jpg>.
>
> Moose
>
> Chris Barker wrote:
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
