Yes, I think it´s not the right forum to talk about this topic but I´m
pretty sure you know you can achive better results with higher sampling rate
than 16 bits. Por cierto, ¿familia española y residente en Uruguay? Soy de
La Coruna - Spain ;-)
Un abrazo,
David
De familia española supongo.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fernando Gonzalez Gentile" <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Photoshop
> Hi David,
>
> Hope not to start over on this topic, neither question your HW SW advice.
> Just to point out that for vinyl being better than redbooks, they should
be
> high quality and clean pressings, and a high-end MC cartridge, and
> turntable, and arm, and phono pre-amp, and cabling, are all equally
> necessary.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Fernando.
>
> From: "David Irisarri" <div2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:52:50 +0200
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] Photoshop
>
> [snip]
> Because, everybody knows that vinyl
> records are much better than CDs 44.1 kHz /16 bits.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alienspecimen" <alienspecimen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 3:07 AM
> Subject: [OM] [OT] Photoshop
>
> [snip]
> With the computer I intend to buy, I am also going to sample all my vinyl
> records and transfer them to digital domain.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|