Hi Chris, thanks for the post. You should try to match the POV so it would
be a fairer comparison... With digital, you have to be very careful not to
overexpose even just a tad, otherwise you get cloudless sky and lose
everything up there. I bet there are at least one stop of difference
between the G5 shot and the OM4 shot, so again, it makes it difficult to
compare.
At 10:52 AM 6/20/2004, Chris Barker wrote:
>Provia 400F:
>http://www.threeshoes.co.uk/temp/A0442403_Ireland.jpg
>
>C*non Powershot G5:
>http://www.threeshoes.co.uk/temp/D04680_Ireland.jpg
>
>I have not adjusted either shot, nor do I claim any artistic interest
>in the composition; I took them solely for comparison. My conclusion
>is that it is much easier to acquire an image which is pleasingly
>exposed using film when there is a wide range of exposure values in a
>scene. Digital, at least this digital, is ghastly when shot into the
>light.
>
>However, I should be interested in your opinions.
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
