Excellent post Walt: 1. a nice example of the worth of a slide film,
range of colour and tone; and you used the plupef
On 10 Jun 2004, at 20:43, Walt Wayman wrote:
> As much as I hate to toot my own horn and call attention to myself
> (pause here for the expected guffaws) I think my latest TOPE entry is
> probably a pretty fair example of the full range of slide film, which
> I find more than adequate in most situations, particularly if exposed
> correctly.
>
> http://www.tope.nl/tope_show_entry.php?event=18&pic=7
>
> The original, of course, shows even more detail in both shadow and
> highlight, and if I had had the Minolta 5400 at the time I made the
> scan, with its 4.8 dynamic range, this might be more evident in this
> example. Also, reducing the photo to a JPEG size to meet TOPE
> requirements didn't help either.
>
> Walt
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message from Winsor Crosby : --------------
> --SNIP--
>> Slide film is criticized because it
>> does not have the dynamic range of color negative film because a
>> smaller light difference will cause a greater change in value on the
>> film. The whole trick is to try and get the extremes in the world
>> which
>> your eye has no trouble with reduced down to to 7 or 8 f stops that
>> can
>> be handled by the best photomedia.
>>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|