Subject: | [OM] Re: Day at work |
---|---|
From: | "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:21:34 -0600 |
I was going to suggest that you were just angry because she had rejected your advances but won't do that because we can't have you losing any more lunches. Malnutrition is not healthy. She does sound like a good photography subject. Perhaps some lurid 8x10 glossy prints could convince her to be nicer......... /jmac -----Original Message----- From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Andrew Fildes Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:58 PM To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: [OM] Re: Day at work Girl? Not in any definition I can manage. The pointy headed boss from hell. I must have been really, really bad in a former life to draw this card. AndrewF <<<<snip ============================================== ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM][OT] (Was Re: Tamron - what IS OT then?), Rob Harrison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: [OM][OT] (Was Re: Tamron - what IS OT then?), Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Day at work, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Day at work, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |