Thanks for your reply Graham. The colour is better on the Minolta scan
as well; perhaps the 'generic' setting in Vuescan (Ed Hamrick has not
yet included any Fuji characteristics with Vuescan) is less useful for
Provia 400 than the Minolta software provides.
Chris
On 29 May 2004, at 12:32, Graham Battison wrote:
>
> From : "Chris Barker"
> To : olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject : [OM] Manual or Auto focus scan?
>
>
> http://www.threeshoes.co.uk/temp_pics.htm
>
>> But I do not believe
>> that either image is better than the other because of the scanning
>> focus system.
>
> I would agree with that
>
>> I should be
>> interested to hear from Windoze users if the display is dark.
>
> Perfect on my Win98
>
> The minolta scan is a better version on my monitor because the Vuescan
> has a few 'hotspots'
>
> Graham
> www.geebeephoto.com
>
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|