I agree with Chuck. It's why negatives are so much more forgiving.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:22 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Dynamic range of films
>
> I would have thought it the other way around. Slide film has a greater
> dynamic range.
>
> Foxy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus mail list" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:17 PM
> Subject: [OM] Dynamic range of films
>
>
> Piers said:
> I don't know what was in Yves' mind but from my perspective, the dynamic
> range of a slide is much greater than that of a negative, and it must
> therefore be more demanding of the scanner to reproduce that dynamic
range.
> -----------------------
> I always thought the dynamic range of slide film was about 4 stops and
> of color negative film about 5-5.5 stops. Am I wrong?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|